You are here

A Framework for an Optimal and Adaptive BMDS Firing Doctrine

Award Information
Agency: Department of Defense
Branch: Missile Defense Agency
Contract: W9113M-04-C-0084
Agency Tracking Number: 022-0519
Amount: $1,648,430.00
Phase: Phase II
Program: SBIR
Solicitation Topic Code: MDA02-017
Solicitation Number: 2002.2
Timeline
Solicitation Year: 2002
Award Year: 2004
Award Start Date (Proposal Award Date): 2004-08-10
Award End Date (Contract End Date): 2006-08-09
Small Business Information
4000 Cathedral Ave, NW Suite 121B, Washington, DC, 20016
DUNS: 122651990
HUBZone Owned: N
Woman Owned: N
Socially and Economically Disadvantaged: N
Principal Investigator
 C. Tucker Battle
 President
 (202) 498-2819
 tbattle@CardinalSA.com
Business Contact
 C. Battle
Title: President
Phone: (202) 498-2819
Email: tbattle@CardinalSA.com
Research Institution
N/A
Abstract
The BMDS is being developed as a fully integrated, layered defense capable of defending against all ranges of threats. A critical aspect of this development is an integrated approach to interceptor allocation. A model-based framework for optimizing multi-layer BMDS performance, developing interceptor firing doctrine, and providing for adaptive, real-time interceptor allocation was developed in Phase I. A key feature of this framework is its ability to adapt interceptor allocation to the performance of system functions (e.g., kill assessment) and the reliability of events (e.g., booster separation) that affect the outcome of the interaction between an attacker and the interceptors allocated to kill that attacker. The feasibility and utility of this approach were demonstrated in a desktop environment using a two-layer BMDS (notionally boost phase and midcourse layers) with imperfect shoot-look-shoot (SLS) between the layers. The objective of Phase II is to develop (1) additional interceptor allocation functionality (e.g, by adding a model of midcourse discrimination), (2) an allocation-centric, Monte Carlo simulation, and (3) allocation functionality based on value threatened (versus the attacker-centric objective function used in Phase I).

* Information listed above is at the time of submission. *

US Flag An Official Website of the United States Government