Lightweight Robotic Excavation

Award Information
Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch: N/A
Contract: NNX10CE58P
Agency Tracking Number: 094900
Amount: $99,927.00
Phase: Phase I
Program: SBIR
Awards Year: 2010
Solicitation Year: 2009
Solicitation Topic Code: X6.01
Solicitation Number: N/A
Small Business Information
4551 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-3524
DUNS: 019738852
HUBZone Owned: N
Woman Owned: N
Socially and Economically Disadvantaged: N
Principal Investigator
 Alexander Gutierrez
 Principal Investigator
 (412) 682-3282
Business Contact
 David Gump
Title: Business Official
Phone: (412) 682-3282
Research Institution
Robust, lightweight, power-efficient excavation robots are mission enablers for lunar outposts and surface systems. Lunar excavators of this type cost-effectively utilize native materials for both outpost preparation and in-situ resource utilization. They address the need for implements that dig, collect, transport, and dump lunar soil. Past prototypes, while providing valuable insights, have either been too large, too slow, or had too little pound-for pound regolith moving capacity (payload ratio) to be real options for a lunar outpost. Novel designs incorporating dump beds, high-speed driving, and composite materials are game changers, making lightweight excavation robots advantageous for lunar site and surface work. Performance of elemental actions such as digging or driving has been studied, but it is performance in achieving a site-level task like berm building that matters. This proposal team has identified payload ratio and driving speed as dominating parameters governing site work. This has been done by creating and applying a task-level simulator, REMOTE (Regolith Excavation, Mobility & Tooling Environment), for a prior NASA contract. Current excavation force models do not adequately address cohesion and soil-tool friction within a lunar-relevant regime, as this work proposes to do. Trade studies and prototypes of lunar excavators are informative, but direct controlled comparisons of configuration options (ex. loader or dozer) will yield the best means of choosing a real design. The Technology Readiness Level (TRL) at the beginning of the proposed Phase I work is 2. The anticipated results of Phase I include a prototype design as well as experimental data supporting the feasibility of the concept, bringing the TRL to 3. Phase II will result in a completed prototype that will be used to validate predictions of key parameters, bringing the TRL to 4.

* Information listed above is at the time of submission. *

Agency Micro-sites

SBA logo
Department of Agriculture logo
Department of Commerce logo
Department of Defense logo
Department of Education logo
Department of Energy logo
Department of Health and Human Services logo
Department of Homeland Security logo
Department of Transportation logo
Environmental Protection Agency logo
National Aeronautics and Space Administration logo
National Science Foundation logo
US Flag An Official Website of the United States Government