You are here

Using the Conditional Moment Closure Method to Assess the Effects of Turbulence Chemical Kinetics

Award Information
Agency: Department of Defense
Branch: Army
Contract: W31P4Q-16-C-0119
Agency Tracking Number: A16A-001-0116
Amount: $149,992.00
Phase: Phase I
Program: STTR
Solicitation Topic Code: A16A-T001
Solicitation Number: 2016.0
Timeline
Solicitation Year: 2016
Award Year: 2016
Award Start Date (Proposal Award Date): 2016-08-09
Award End Date (Contract End Date): 2017-04-09
Small Business Information
17301 W. Colfax Avenue #160
Golden, CO 80401
United States
DUNS: 196231166
HUBZone Owned: No
Woman Owned: No
Socially and Economically Disadvantaged: No
Principal Investigator
 Scott Martin
 (303) 881-7992
 maris38@erau.edu
Business Contact
 Todd Leeson
Phone: (303) 881-7992
Email: tleeson@rxnsys.com
Research Institution
 Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
 David Wickham
 
600 S. Clyde Morris Blvd. \N
Daytona Beach, FL 32114
United States

 (720) 352-7161
 Nonprofit College or University
Abstract

The ability to accurately design and predict the performance of combustion-based machinery like gas turbine engines is important in improving their performance, increasing their fuel economy, lowering operating costs, and decreasing pollutant emissions. Almost all of the flows are turbulent in industrial combustion applications, therefore understanding the interaction between turbulence and combustion chemistry is also important. Currently most reacting flow CFD codes employ subgrid combustion models tuned with the reaction kinetics measured in laminar flows. As a result, it is possible that we are not accounting for the chemistry-turbulence interaction correctly, ultimately resulting in sub-optimized combustion system hardware designs. We are therefore proposing to investigate this interaction on a simple, small-scale level as a means to identify and quantify kinetic reaction path differences between the laminar and turbulent flame regimes. Success in this effort will allow us to extract new reduced kinetic mechanisms applicable to both regimes and improve the solution quality of reacting flow CFD codes. We also expect this effort will improve our ability to economically extract reduced mechanisms with lower overall computational costs, materially improving the productivity of reacting flow CFD simulations.

* Information listed above is at the time of submission. *

US Flag An Official Website of the United States Government